Recent Articles
Repigmentation response of childhood vitiligo (> 75% and < 75% repigmentation) after reduction of epidermal H2O2
with pseudocatalase PC-KUS: (a) total repigmentation (%) on the face/neck; (b) total repigmentation (%) on the trunk; (c) total
repigmentation (%) on the upper and lower extremities; (d) total repigmentation (%) on the hands and feet. n, number of patients in
each column.
Clinical examples of
repigmentation of vitiligo vulgaris after
reduction/removal of epidermal H2O2 by
pseudocatalase PC-KUS. (a) Comparison
of facial vitiligo vulgaris before treatment
(i) and after 12 months of treatment (ii) in
an 8-year-old boy (skin phototype III).
(b) Vitiligo in the neck area before
treatment (i) and after 12 months of
treatment (ii) in an 8-year-old girl (skin
phototype IV). (c) Vitiligo of the trunk
before treatment (i) and after 12 months
of treatment (ii) in an 11-year-old boy
(skin phototype IV). (d) Vitiligo of the
lower extremities before treatment (i) and
after 12 months of treatment (ii) in an
11-year-old boy (skin phototype III).
(e) Acute vitiligo of both hands before
treatment (i) and after 12 months of
treatment (ii) in an 8-year-old boy
(skin phototype III). Photograph
documentation under Wood’s light.
Repigmentation in segmental vitiligo. (a) Facial
segmental vitiligo in a 6-year-old girl (skin phototype III) before
treatment (i) and after 12 months of treatment (ii). (b) Mixed
vitiligo vulgaris and vitiligo segmentalis before treatment (i) and
after 12 months of treatment (ii). Note the delayed response in
segmental vitiligo.
back
|